Kubespray vs KIND: Which Kubernetes Setup Tool Should You Choose?
When it comes to setting up a Kubernetes cluster, two names often come up: Kubespray and KIND (Kubernetes IN Docker). Both are open-source, both simplify Kubernetes cluster provisioning, but they serve different purposes.
Let’s explore their differences, use cases, and when to choose one over the other.
What is KIND?
KIND is a tool for running local Kubernetes clusters using Docker container “nodes”. It’s primarily aimed at testing Kubernetes itself, CI workflows, and local development.
Use cases:
- Quick Kubernetes sandbox on a laptop
- CI pipelines
- Testing Kubernetes upgrades or features
Example: Create a KIND Cluster
kind create cluster --name dev
What is Kubespray?
Kubespray is a project that uses Ansible to deploy production-ready Kubernetes clusters on virtual machines or bare metal.
Use cases:
- On-premises Kubernetes
- Bare-metal or cloud VMs
- Highly customizable installations
Example: Install with Kubespray
git clone https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubespray.git
cd kubespray
pip install -r requirements.txt
ansible-playbook -i inventory/mycluster/hosts.yaml cluster.yml
Key Differences
Feature | KIND | Kubespray |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Local dev & CI | Production cluster provisioning |
Runtime | Docker | VMs, Bare metal, Cloud |
Complexity | Very low | Moderate to High |
Customization | Minimal | Extensive |
Installation | Single command | Ansible-based, multi-step |
When to Use What?
- 💻 Use KIND if you need a lightweight, disposable cluster for local development or CI testing.
- 🏭 Use Kubespray for production-grade clusters, especially in environments without managed Kubernetes.
Final Thoughts
KIND and Kubespray are not direct competitors, but rather complementary tools. One is for development, the other for deployment.
Choose based on your environment, your scale, and your automation goals.
→ Learn more: